Argentinian president Javier Milei’s recent so called “War on Diversity” has sparked mass protest, with the result being thousands taking to the streets. This comes as a response to his administration, which has ultimately dismantled policies designed in order to protect minority and marginalized communities. As Per NBC NEWS Milei has shut down many key government institutions, such as “the Ministry of Women, Genders and Diversity and the National Institute against Discrimination, Xenophobia and Racism (INADI)” all with the justification of being a cost cutting measure. In addition to this, this same article outlines how Mileis’ administration is framing LGBTQ and Minority communities as “ideological excesses” rather than democratic safeguards, Which ultimately mirrors the warning signs of democratic backsliding. However, though the immediate concern at hand in Argentina is the erosion of diversity, the broader concern world wide lies in the fact that this is the latest of many dominoes to fall in Argentinas alarming recent spell. As, Milei’s crackdown on minority rights is yet another step in the country’s ongoing trend toward democratic erosion.
Though Milei is no stranger to this trend. Throughout his time in office, he has implicitly used the power of the emergency decrees at his disposal in order to bypass the Congress of the nation and implement his economic and other policies regardless of opposition or other parties wishes. This in itself is an act of executive aggrandizement, where Milei is by – passing the institutional checks placed and ultimately is diminishing legislative oversight, which is thus reducing deliberation on major reforms (typical conversations on wether or not to pass these policies), all to implement his own policies at his own wishes faster and with no oversight. It is with this undermining of democracy from within that ultimately begins to mark the erosion of democracy as a whole.
Though Milei’s attack on the LGBTQ+ community goes beyond the dismantling of policy. His rhetoric has been especially controversial, extending to the labeling of LGBTQ+ persons as “pedophiles”. Though this framing strategy is not new, and rather is one of risk that has been used in the past to undermine and marginalize minority groups. NBC NEWS underscores the role of Milei’s campaign in intensifying this hostility toward minority communities prior to him taking office, stating that “since Milei’s campaign, even before taking office, we have registered a lot of violence, discrimination, and hatred towards our community.” This anti-democratic rhetoric fosters a culture of hate and not inclusivity, which is ultimately following along with broader concept of authoritarian consolidation, in which we see how leaders create moral panic in order to justify their repressive measures and ultimately to strengthen their power.
Though, this delegitimizing/ accusatory rhetoric used by Milei and his administration is not only present in the LGBTQ+ realm, but rather across various topics. Across various media outlets such as Tik Tok, X, etc. in addition to traditional ones, Milei frequently lashes out against opposition parties and social movements, branding them as “obstacles to national progress”. Which As per Levitsky and Ziblatt highlight in their How Democracies Die, “leaders who frame their opponents as enemies rather than legitimate competitors erode democratic norms”. Milei even goes as far as to scapegoating minority and migrant groups potentially signifying democratic breakdown. In terms of this democratic breakdown, and undermining of government, it is also worthy of noting that on his first day in office last year Milei famously took his”chainsaw” to office as promised during his campaign, and instantly cut the government ministries in half all while using his signature “afuera” catchphrase.
Ultimately, while Argentinas inflation rates are lowering at a large rate (with the lowest inflation rate in recent history), it is worth mentioning the questions of, can governance that prioritizes economic recovery justify institutional weakening? and Is Economic relief worth more than a functioning democracy? I say this as Milei’s leadership in Argentina exemplifies various aspects of democratic backsliding, especially regarding the consolidation of executive power, suppression of opposition, and weakening of institutions. And now with LGBTQ+ being at the forefront, it does make you wonder what lies next for Argentina under Javier Milei.
Hey Stavros! This piece on the ongoing democratic erosion in Argentina under Milei’s power outlines some truly concerning cases of backsliding that pose a harm to minority groups. I can’t help but notice the parallels between Milei’s leadership and Trump’s presidency in the US over the last few weeks, in which Trump similarly has scapegoated the LGBTQ+ community and immigrants. Milei’s shutdown of the INADI as a “cost-cutting measure” is reminiscent of President Trump’s war against DEI in the workplace and education system, which he claims costs millions of dollars and jobs. It’s incredibly worrying and frustrating to witness new leaders undoing decades of work aimed at helping those who have long been marginalized by the political system. However hard it may be to reverse the ongoing erosion, we must keep in mind that we’ve come so far already and we can rebuild our systems under new, and better, leadership.
Hi Stavros! This is a great post, an important opportunity to highlight a critical conjuncture in Argentina and center marginalized groups in discussions on democratic erosion.
Regarding the first component, I would add that Executive Decrees in Argentina, known as Decretos de Necesidad y Urgencia (DNUs), hold significant power to bypass negotiations with the opposition and implement rapid changes. The concept of “necessity and urgency” has been broadly interpreted, and there have been efforts to reform this traditional executive tool. Some authors even consider the reform of DNUs an “outstanding political debt” in the effort to balance executive power.
As an often overused institutional mechanism, many presidents have relied on DNUs. The concern you and I share is how they are now being used to target policies designed to protect and promote human rights. Given Milei’s actions, perhaps an interesting path for discussion is advocating for limitations on this executive tool when used to enact discrimination and roll back human rights. Also it could be redesigned as an institutional resource to be prohibited to acts that represent democratic backsliding strategies. There are also really interesting suggestions by constitutional law scholars in Argentina that could be thought-provoking to check out.
Just a suggestion for discussion, great job!