German democracy is slowly eroding, and it all comes back to Angela Merkel stepping down as chancellor. Well, that may be a bit dramatic, but the premise still stands: Angela Merkel’s relinquishing of power has extremely negative connotations for German democracy.
Merkel was the German Chancellor for sixteen years, and her influence on German politics was a level of stability unmatched due to her strong belief in protecting German interests while promoting the European Union. However, the stability truly came from the trust the German people felt in her party, the Christian Democratic Union, who “most analysts agree […] would comfortably win the next elections if she were running for a fifth term” (Matthijs 2021). Perhaps it is a sign of her lasting impact on German politics that the party was able to stay in power for so long; according to Bremmer (2021), “her party is in historic decline.” The CDU has begun to lose dreadfully to its rivals, even as Merkel’s approval rating is at 80 percent as she leaves office. While this is a sad statement for the once powerful CDU to end on, it does not necessarily mean German democracy is eroding.
How, then, does Merkel stepping down have negative connotations for German democracy? Though her legacy is one that will overshadow many chancellors to come, the problem lies in the Germany she helped create- the one she leaves behind. Merkel was a powerful chancellor, but she was also a controversial one. Her open appreciation of the European Union and Germany’s part in it, as well as her opening of the country to “more than one million migrants” in the 2015 refugee crisis, led to a more populist undertaking in German politics (Bremmer 2021). The populist rise in Germany is worrisome due to the country’s history of dictatorship and the horrors associated with Nazi rule- the worst of those being the Holocaust, a genocide-, but it is no surprise that the rise coincides with the stepping down of a very powerful chancellor. With Merkel’s departure imminent, the far right in Germany is waiting in the wings for the transition of power.
The particular far right party that has made an attempt to fill the void of Merkel’s Christian Democratic Union is the Alternative for Deutschland Party, or the AfD. The party has been known for its anti-immigrant stances and often dismisses the true horrors of the Holocaust and Nazi occupation, but these stances seem not to bother many German citizens as the Holocaust fades from collective conciousness and immigration continues to be an issue (BBC 2020). Following the 2015 refugee crisis, in which Merkel opened Germany’s borders to more migrants than some German citizens approved of, the people looked for a new savior, one that was not the current political parties. To them, the current parties did not give them a voice, and they desperately needed one. They found it in AfD, who received thirteen percent of the vote in the 2017 national elections, giving them a spot in the Bundestag (Mushaben 2020). This election was historic for the state; for the first time since 1949, a party with “neo-Nazi adherents” held a place in parliament. Mushaben (2020) explains that the far right, but especially AfD, saw this breakthrough as a “revolt against Merkel;” that is, the fringe party sees itself as the antithesis to Merkel’s CDU.
It could be said that the democratic processes in Germany are actually perfectly intact due to the election of the AfD to the Bundestag; the people, after all, still have the right to elect who they choose. However, the election itself is not the problem. German elections are doing quite well in allowing the people to have a voice, where political discontent was shown in the loss of CDU-CSU votes. The coalition dropped from 33 percent to barely over 24 percent in the span of a few years, a clear sign that the German people are angered (Bremmer 2021). Rather, it is the message driving the party and their voters that shows how German democracy is eroding.
German voters no longer feel heard by their politicians, finding that the status quo no longer works for them (SPIEGEL 2016). Now, the fight is between the “defenders of fundamental values and those who call them into question” (SPIEGEL 2016). The AfD is definitely the party who calls fundamental values into question, with their blatant hate speech and anti-immigrant views challenging German politics at every turn. The people like this, seeing the AfD as a hopeful new face. However, when the threat of neo-Nazism accompanies a party, the dangers of that party only grows.
Angela Merkel made choices as chancellor that will no doubt impact the way German chancellors govern for decades to come. However, it is her choices- specifically her stepping down as chancellor- that have allowed far right parties to step into the power vacuum she has left behind. Though it currently seems uncertain if far right parties will succeed in German politics, the truth is clear: if it were not for the relinquishing of power by Merkel, the AfD would not have gotten such a leg up in the elections.
BBC. (2020, February 11). Germany’s AFD: How right-wing is Nationalist Alternative for Germany? BBC News. Retrieved December 1, 2021, from https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-37274201.
Bremmer, I. (2021, September 28). Angela Merkel’s legacy is saving and strengthening Europe. Time. Retrieved December 1, 2021, from https://time.com/6102034/angela-merkel-legacy/.
Cliffe, J. (2021, June 15). Why the rise and decline of the AFD party in Germany is a parable for our Times. New Statesman. Retrieved December 1, 2021, from https://www.newstatesman.com/politics/2020/10/why-rise-and-decline-afd-party-germany-parable-our-times.
Matthijs, M. (2021, September 17). Merkel’s legacy and the future of Germany. Council on Foreign Relations. Retrieved December 1, 2021, from https://www.cfr.org/in-brief/merkels-legacy-and-future-germany.
Mushaben, Joyce Marie. 2020. “A Spectre Haunting Europe.” Berghahn Journals. https://www.berghahnjournals.com/view/journals/gps/38/1/gps380102.xml (October 18, 2021).
Spiegel, D. (2016, November 23). German democracy eroding amid populist rise. DER SPIEGEL. Retrieved December 1, 2021, from https://www.spiegel.de/international/germany/german-democracy-eroding-amid-populist-rise-a-1122271.html.
Hi Reece! I found this post extremely interesting. The events of Merkel deciding to step down are recent. While she had very high approval ratings, sixteen years is a long time to spend as chancellor. If she managed to stay in office longer, I feel it may have been a questionable action by someone considered a strong leader of democratic principles. While I think it is an important aspect of democracy for transitions of power to occur, I can see your concern. Right-wing populism has been a phenomenon to plague western countries in recent years. It shows that Germany is not immune to populists considering the AfD party winning a notable thirteen percent of the vote in 2017. An interesting question might be, does Merkel stepping down increase support for populist leaders or decrease them? Normally, populism relies on the “us vs. them” mentality and distrust in elites. Was populism rising because of distrust in Merkel and her party? Will populism continue to rise with distrust in every party excluding the AfD? Will Germany’s democracy strengthen due to peaceful transitions of power between parties holding different beliefs? With all this being so new, I can imagine only time will give us these answers.
Hi Reece! I really enjoyed reading your article. I knew some about the German government, but not to the depth that your post went. I found it interesting that despite your title saying Merkel is the catalyst for this erosion, you actually gave her praise at the beginning, stating she promoted strong german values as well as the success of the european union. I then went on to read the following paragraph, which said why she was in fact the catalyst. I assumed (wrongly) that she was directly causing the democratic erosion, but after reading, found out she was causing it indirectly with her departure. This was a result of the far right waiting to take her place, and becoming the direct cause of democratic erosion. This far right party seems to be pretty extreme. The comparison that they were the first party with “neo nazi adherents” since world war two (or just after[1949]) is crazy to me. You then went on to talk about how their electoral system hasn’t been corrupted by the AfD, rather their message to the voters is causing this democratic erosion. The German people, rightfully so, seem to feel they no longer have a voice, which is a huge sign of democratic erosion. Finally, I really like how you wrapped it up; you ended by simply putting that merkels departure paved the way for the AfD to come to power, and given that you were supposed to write to an audience that knew nothing about this, i think you summed up your post perfectly and in an easy-to-understand manner.
Hi Reece! I thought your blog post was great and very informative! I was not aware that the German Chancellor’s were able to stay in power for so long, and that Merkel had been the Chancellor for four terms. I initially saw Merkel’s decision to step down and not run for a fifth term as a positive thing for German democracy. However, you make a great point about the potential threat to democracy her stepping down could lead to, depending on who becomes the next Chancellor of Germany. It was good to see that Germany’s elections are at least doing well and people have a voice there. This is a great thing for Germany’s democracy, but the election of parties that do not represent democratic ideals having the potential to win is not a positive thing for Germany’s democracy. As you mention, the Alternative for Deutschland (AfD) party’s message shows democratic erosion in Germany. It is concerning that the AfD has anti-immigrant stances and dismisses horrors of the Holocaust, and this party is increasingly being able to get votes in elections. It is a controversial topic to decide what should be done to keep parties that stand for such undemocratic things from winning in a democracy.
Hi Reece, I thought this was a great post analyzing the potential for a major disruption in the political scene of Germany in the upcoming months. The AfD sounds like bad news for German democracy. We have seen this anti-immigration rhetoric in several Western democracies in the past few years, such as the United Kingdom and Hungary. Powerful figures will tend to scapegoat the country’s problems on foreigners in order to appeal to the mass population who is frustrated with the current government. These types of far-right populist parties are widely successful in the modern era and are very dangerous. Once they receive power, they tend not to bring to fruition promises that they made to get to that place. I found it very shocking that a party associated with neo-Nazism has found such success, especially regarding Germany’s history with the topic. It’s also interesting how you pointed out that it is not Germany’s institutions themselves that are eroding, their elections are relatively fair, but that it is the message behind the party that is a danger. Similar to what is seen in Hungary, it could be possible that once the party is in power, they could enact legislation that would start to directly harm the institutions of democracy. I definitely think this is why it is important to prevent populist parties from gaining too much traction politically.